News DeNA reprinted from personal sites "What should not be done" Welq has not been used for the WelQ case?

DeNA website (November 8, 2021 Screenshot | https: // DeNA.com/JP/)

Unauthorized reproduction from an external site has been discovered on the site of the cloud -based service "COOPEL" operated by DeNA. When the victim pointed out, the DeNA acknowledged that it was "created for reference" and deleted the relevant part. "Due to the lack of understanding and recognition of the creator, it was released without going through the content check process." [Image] Comparison of damage sites and DeNA sites over the DeNA, which was operated in 2016, and had a problem with incorrect information, copying from other sites, and rewriting. In response to interviews with lawyer dot com news, DeNA said, "I deeply reflect on being a company, and further strengthen internal education and check systems regarding the use of third -party content and further strengthen recurrence. We will respond. " The damage was Murashun (@murashun). He posted a list of "regular expressions" on his site, and said that it was reprinted almost as it was, replacing some of the specific examples with "Coopel". He found it when he searched for "regular expression" to check his page ranking on Google. ● Is there a copyright in the "list" of regular expression? The regular expression itself is just a notation. However, even if it is not protected by copyright, there may be rights depending on how to summarize. Megumi Futake, who is more than copyright, says: "Even if the individual materials are not protected by copyright, if the creativity is recognized in either the selection or array of the material, it will be protected by copyright as a copyright of editing. Even if the configuration (array) has existed before, if the selection of the material is found to be creative, it will be protected by copyright, and even if the selection of the material is not recognized as the creativity. If the creativity is recognized in the configuration (array), it will be protected by copyright. It is simply determined by whether or not creativity is recognized compared to the previous one. " However, in this case, it also has the property of summarizing the basic expressions, and it seems hard to say that even though there is a certain level of ingenuity, it is legally creative. "The" Basic Regular expression "that became a question this time was organized in a list of" regular expression "," explanation of regular expression "," example of regular expression ", and" match examples ". Each described in these items only indicates only rules and searched expressions, the explanation is extremely short, and there is no room for the creativity of the author. The material itself is not protected by copyright. Therefore, we will consider whether it will be protected as a copyrighted work in editing. However, there is a place to introduce basic expressions, so I think it is difficult to recognize the creativity of the author, as well as those used in the arrangement table that introduces other regular expressions. Also, how to organize the material is similar to the other arrangement table, and it is difficult to recognize the creativity in the table array that became the question this time. As a result, the question was the question. I don't think that the basic regular expression is protected by copyright. " It is not a request. However, if a company has copied and copied the personal site, there is an ethical problem even if it is safe to copyright. It is natural for the parties to protest. "DeNA has caused a WELQ case in the past, but I felt that the recurrence was not functioning sufficiently. Strict rules and mechanisms that do not have to copy content, as well as corrections and recurrence. We hope to improve the literacy of DeNA officials. " She has been involved in many intellectual property infringement and wrote a book on the protection of product design. She is also involved in heritage support, traffic accidents, medical mistakes, etc.. She gets a reversal ruling in the Osaka High Court as an artist's agent in the "Goldfish Phone Box" case (copyright infringement lawsuit). Office name: Star Sogo Law Office URL: http: // www.STAR-LAW.JP/

Lawyer dot com news editorial department